Causality analysis between exports, imports and economic growth of Pakistan

  • 2017 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Page: 39-44


The objective of study is to identify causal relationships among the variables such as exports, imports and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in case of Pakistan. The study uses time series data for the period from 1981-2016. Stationarity is checked with the Augmented Dickey Fullers' (ADF) test, and the Engle Grange approach is utilized to determine the long run relationship among variables of the study. Moreover, causality among the selected variables is tested by using the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). We found that the causality runs from GDP to imports and exports. Furthermore, no causal relation is found from exports to GDP and from imports to GDP, but the causality goes from GDP to these two variables. The causality from GDP to exports and imports are positive and significant. Finally, the results indicate that the causal relationship between GDP and imports is stronger than the GDP and exports.

Keywords and JEL Classification


Imports, Exports, Economic Growth, Causality

JEL Classification

F14; F43

1. Introduction

   Economic growth of an economy can be viewed as a shift in its production possibility frontier or an increase in the country’s total output or production. Many factors affect economic growth that also includes country's imports and exports of the country. Exports lead to an increase in output or growth rate of a country. Export-led growth hypothesis states that an increase in exports enhances economic growth. Exports directly contribute to the gross domestic product (GDP). Exports allow a country to benefit from the large markets or economies of scale (Helpman & Krugman, 1985). Rodrick (1988) stated that exports lead firm to large-scale production, technological change and an increasing rate of capital formation.

   Inversely, the relationship from economic growth to export is called growth-led exports. When domestic output increases more than domestic demand, then economic growth affect the export growth (Sharma & Dhakal, 1994). Therefore, both the relationship from exports growth to economic growth and from economic growth to exports growth is possible. There may be a two-way causality from export growth to economic growth and vice versa (Ramos, 2001).

   It is important to investigate the relationship between exports and economic growth. Sharma et al. (1991) employed Granger Causality approach and found a positive association between exports and economic growth rates. Some studies also found a negative relationship between them especially for countries like Korea and Hong Kong (Dodaro, 1993). Hatemi (2002) also tested the exports and economic growth relationship in case of Japan and found a bi-directional causality.

   In this research paper, Engle-Granger and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) have been applied to test for cointegration and causality relationships among exports, imports and economic growth rate in the case of Pakistan. Previously, it has been shown that the causality between GDP and exports is bidirectional over the period 1971-2014, such as exports cause to GDP of the country and GDP cause to exports (Hussain, 2014). Some other studies have also investigated the causality between exports and economic growth of Pakistan (Shirazi & Manap, 2004, and Iqbal et al., 2012). This research not only uses more recent data but also investigates the imports and economic growth nexus as well.

2. Literature Review

   Exports and imports both play a key role in the economic development of a country. Examination of the impact of exports and imports on economic growth has been remained under empirical and theoretical investigations. The empirical research has found mix results about these relationships. Some of the previous research on the said relationship is reviewed as follows:

   Gibba and Molnar (2016) tested the relationship between export and economic growth using data for the period of 1980-2010 for Gambia. They found causality relationship running from export to economic growth of Gambia. Oxley (1993) and Ram (1985) also found similar results. Furthermore, some studies found causality from growth rate to exports (Shihab et al., 2014) and Findly, 1984). Alkhateeb et al. (2016) used data for the period 1980 to 2013 for Saudi Arabia and found a bi-directional causality between exports and growth.

   Hussain and Afaf (2014) investigate the effects of export and import on economic growth in the case of Saudi Arabia using 22 observations for the period from 1990-2011. They employed both co-integration and granger causality tests, found that although the causation from exports to growth was significant but imports to growth was not statistically significant. For exports, imports and growth causalities, Ajmi et al. (2015) did not find the significant relationships for South Africa. Asafu-Adjaye et al. (1999) also did not find causality relationship in the case of India. Therefore, the studies of Ajmi et al. (2015) and Asafu-Adjaye et al. (1999) did not find the evidence of export-led growth. However, Yuhong et al. (2010) found that the growth in imports promoted the rate of economic growth in China. In addition to this, Achchuthan (2013) also concluded that as imports increases, economic growth also increases. The studies of Haseeb et al. (2014), Irwan et al. (2015), and Khan et al. (2016) examined the exports and economic growth relationshipsand they found that exports and growth have significantly positive association. Yuksel and Zengin (2016) analyzed the export, import and growth causality relationship for six developing countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, Malaysia, Mexico and Turkey) using data for the period from 1961-2014. Using time series econometrics techniques to measure for causality and co-integration, it was found that in case of Argentina, increase in exports causes an increase growth rate. However, in China and Turkey case. Imports cause an increase in exports. The relationship between the imports and economic growth has not been similar for countries under study.

   Due to the mixed results indicated in the studies reviewed above, it is pertinent to test the causality through co-integration between exports, imports and economic growth for Pakistan economy over the period 1981-2016.

3. Research Methods

4. Empirical Findings and Results

5. Conclusion

   The main objective of this study was to empirically examine the causal relationship between exports and economic growth as well as imports and economic growth of Pakistan over the period of 1981-2016. The study employed ADF test to check for the unit root, Engle-Grange approach of co-integration and the VECM analysis for testing the causal relationship. The Engle-Granger approach is performed to identify co-integration among exports, imports and economic growth. The Engle Granger result revealed that variables exhibit long run relationship or have co-integration. The VECM of causality analysis was used to test the causality. We found a unidirectional causality running from GDP to exports and imports but not vice versa.. The causality from GDP to exports and imports are positive and significant. This implies that increase in GDP increases exports and imports in context of the Pakistan economy over the period of analysis. Results also indicate that the causal relationship between GDP and imports is stronger than the GDP and exports.


Achchuthan, S. (2013). Export, import, and economic growth: evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(9), 147-55.

Ajmi, A. N., Aye, G. C., Balcilar, M., & Gupta, R. (2015). Causality between exports and economic growth in South Africa: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(2), 163-181

Alkhateeb, T. T. Y., Mahmood, H., & Sultan, Z. A. (2016). The Relationship between exports and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. Asian Social Science, 12(4), 117-124

Asafu-Adjaye, J. & Chakraborty, D. (1999). “Export-led Growth and import compression: further time series evidence from LDCs.” Australian Economic Papers, 38: 164-75,

Balassa, B. (1978). “Exports and economic growth: Further evidence.” Journal of Development Economics, 5(2), 181-89.

Dodaro, S. (1993). “Exports and Growth: A Reconsideration of Causality.” Journal of Developing Areas, 27(2), 227-44,

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). “Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing.” Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 251-276,

Findlay, R. (1984). Growth and development in trade models, Handbook of International Economics, (1), 185-236,

Fosu, A. K. (1990). “Exports and economic growth: The African case”. World Development, 18(6), 831-35.

Gibba, A., & Molnar, J. (u.d). A study on exports as a determinant of economic growth in the Gambia, Some Studies of Economics Changes, pp. 237-244,

Haseeb, M., N.H. Hartani, N.A.A. Bakar, Azam M. & S. Hassan, (2014). “Exports, foreign direct investment and economic growth: empirical evidence from Malaysia (1971-2013).” American Journal of Applied Sciences. 11: 1010-1015.

Hatemi, J. A. (2002). “Export Performance and Economic Growth Nexus in Japan: A Bootstrap Approach. Japan and the World Economy, 14 (1), 25-33.

Helpman, E. & Krugman, P. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hussain M (2014) “Export and GDP in Pakistan: evidence from causality and cointegration analysis” International Journal of Management Cases, 16 (1), 37-49

Hussain, M., & Afaf, S. (2014). “Relationship between exports, imports, and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: 1990-2011. Evidence from cointegration and Granger causality analysis. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 5(3), 364-370.

Irwan S., Haseeb, M., Azam M. & Islam, R., (2015). “Foreign direct investment, financial development, international trade and energy consumption: Panel data evidence from selected ASEAN countries.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(3), 841-850.

Iqbal, A., Hameed, I. & Devi, K. (2012). “Relationship between exports and economic growth of Pakistan”. European Journal of Social Sciences, 32(3), 453-460.

Khan, S., Azam, M., & Chandra, E., (2016). “Import demand, income elasticity and growth rate in Pakistan: the impact of trade liberalization.” Foreign Trade Review, 51(3), 1–12

Oxley, L. (1993). “Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Portugal, 1865–1985.” Economics Letters, 43(2),163-166.

Ram, R. (1985). “Exports and economic growth: Some additional evidence.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 415-425,

Ramos, F. (2001). “Exports, imports and economic growth in Portugal: evidence from Causality and Cointegration Analysis.” Economic Modelling, 18(4), 613-623,

Rodrik, D. (1988). “Closing the Technology Gap: Does Trade Liberalization Really Help?, Cambridge NBER Working Paper No 2654.

Sharma, S.C., & Dhakal, D., (1994). “Causal Analysis between Exports and Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” Applied Economics, 26: 1145-1157

Sharma, S., Norris, M., & Cheung, D., (1991). “Exports and economic growth in industrialized countries.” Applied Economics, 23: 697-708

Shihab, R. A., Soufan, T., & Abdul-Khaliq, S. (2014). “The causal relationship between exports and economic growth in Jordan.” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(3), 302-308

Yuhong Li, Zhongwen C. & Changjian S. (2010). “Research on the relationship between foreign trade and the gdp growth of East China— empirical analysis based on causality.” Modern Economy, 1: 118-124,

Yuksel, S. & Zengin, S. (2016). “Causality relationship between import, export and growth rate in developing countries.” International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 2(1), 147-156

Citing Articles (0)

Article Metrics
Citation Indexes